The Dilema

The issue of babri and ram temple has been a long lingering political gimmik. To my mind an average Indian has vertually given up any hope of deriving any life out of the issue. But look at our political masters !!!!!!! By joe they are truely and really capable of deriving out the milage......or Milages out of the dead cow......
Come to really think of it what we the people of India want, is no rukkus is created after the pronouncement of the verdict. Therefore if you sincerely think the verdict has to be a non political and mind you this would also be playing on the minds of the judges and the bench. They would know that the judgement will be disected bisected and what not by one and all including the illiterate political masters their goons and the intellectuals of the country and as usual "jitne Mooh Utni Baten" It will be a TRP race on all channels with panel discussions.
We have been acustomed to the situation that for so any years there has been a Babri Masjid in that place which has not been in existance for almost two decades now. Some of us now want to Build a temple there...... so presently both the things are non existing for all of us who really do not bother if there is a mosk or temple. Most of us Indian (I believe 80%) wish and feel that there should be a National Monument or an Educational Institute or a social centre which can work for Humanity and not for Ram or Rahim.
I do not know how many of you will agree with me that the political leadership of India has given a long handle to the judiciary which looks like a good opportunity to scrap and re write lot of ill treditions that have been built on religious fundamentalism. I for one is totally against the show of religious belief on the roads. Why have the road shows on various religious occassions. What good do they serve us as community and society. In most of the cases when two religious functions requirng the raod show fall together all of us cross our fingers and see that both the religious believer do not crash in to each other. To me this is no different than the policy of British "Divide and Rule". Our political masters are also doing the same and we have been accepting it since independence. This argument of mine is to be seen in retrospect when Bal thought of having Ganesh Festival as a public function and in no uncertain terms the direct answer to the processions of Tajias. I mean what was that thinking which did not ban the religious show off on the road but instigated other community to indulge in the same. Today I feel that the SC should ask government of work out the modalities where in the people of India are free to practice their religion with in the four walls of their homes. Even the display of religious ideologies and identities like Holy cross, or Tabij or locket with swastik or Kada be banned on the streets. Like they have done it for the Uniform men in defence services of India. Where you are first identified as Indian and then by your name. When you are at home you are a religious soul but when you come on street and meet others no one should be able to Identify you as hindu, muslim sikh or isai but only as an INDIAN.

Now the question is can our juduciary touch upon these issues during its judgement on ayodhya and compell the so called political masters to act on these issues. Can we have a national debate on these aspect and more importantly "CAN ALL OF US MEET EACH OTHERS AS INDIAN's ON THE STREETS".